Piers Corbyn: solar charged particles almost entirely responsible for what happens to global temperatures, he claims.
Don Eastbrook: ocean cycles of temperature, especially the Pacific decadal oscillation.
Might it be more complicated than the media pretend?

More signs of the Apocalypse: This is a BBC "Climate Correspondent" writing:

One thing is for sure. It seems the debate about what is causing global warming is far from over. Indeed some would say its hotting up.

The debate is good for science. It's also entertaining to watch. The end result will likely involve better models for predicting the long term temperature changes, or at least a better understanding of what affects it.

The name given to this link is highly misleading, and the article is slightly misleading as well. I suggest those who think that this presents evidence for there being a real debate about whether global warming is real look at the video a few days ago here about that German scientist quoted here.

re: #4 philosophus invidius

Agreed, AGW won't be falsified in the media or on a blog, what is remarkable is that the BBC would allow such an article, and by a "Climate Correspondent" no less. Not normal for the BBC.